Facilitation tool

What do you want AI to do — and what must it never?

Most boards debate AI tool by tool and miss the bigger decision: where in the business they actually want it operating, and where it's off-limits no matter how good it gets. This tool walks a leadership team across the territory, forces a stance on each part, then challenges every line you draw. Nothing is saved — it's a structure for the conversation, not a record of it.

01 — The frame

Two questions, asked of every part of the business.

A mandate without boundaries is reckless; boundaries without a mandate are just fear. You need both, said out loud, area by area — so the organisation knows where it's being asked to move fast and where it absolutely must not.

The mandate

Where do we want AI working for us?

Where would speed, scale, or better judgment create real value — and where are we willing to back that with budget, permission, and air cover for the people doing it?

The boundaries

Where will we not let it operate?

Which decisions, data, and judgments stay human — on principle, not just because the technology isn't ready yet? Name the lines before the pressure to cross them arrives.

Map the territory ↓
02 — Map the territory

Take a stance on each one.

For every area, the room decides: Pursue (we want AI here), Guardrails (only with conditions — human sign-off, limits, monitoring), or Off-limits (not for now, on purpose). The disagreements are the discussion. Tap to set each one; the tally tracks where you've landed.

Pursue 0 Guardrails 0 Off-limits 0 Undecided 0
03 — Challenge it

Now attack your own answers.

The first map is always too comfortable. These provocations push on whatever you decided — the bold calls and the cautious ones — to surface the assumptions hiding underneath. Run them full-screen and make the room defend each line, or admit it can't.

Challenge mode

A deck of assumption-breaking questions, designed to be uncomfortable. Put one on the screen, let the room sit with it, and don't accept the first easy answer.

How to use · 01

Map the territory first, individually if you can — then reveal where people disagree before debating.

How to use · 02

Run challenge mode against your map. A line you can't defend out loud isn't a decision — it's a default.

How to use · 03

Leave with three things written down: where you'll move, where you won't, and what would make you revisit a boundary.

04 — Go deeper

The map is the easy part.

Turning a wall of sticky notes into a mandate the organisation can act on — with clear ownership, real guardrails, and the honest disagreements resolved rather than buried — is the work. We facilitate these sessions for boards and executive teams, and help you operationalise what you decide.

Talk to us about a facilitated session